Volatization, the methods used to test it, and why AMSOIL decided consumers would care.
When speaking about their vehicles, motorists may often comment that their auto “uses a little oil now and then.” Although many are positive that the vehicle is “using” this oil, upon further questioning they often cannot explain how or why or where exactly the oil dissappeared. Is it leaking? Certainly some vehicles will leak an amount of oil out of seals, gaskets and joints. But others that “use” oil have no leaks at all. So where does this oil go? The oil goes through a process known as volatization, and it can end up costing motorists more than just the price of a few quarts of oil.
Why Oil Volatizes
After crude oil has been pumped from the ground, it is sent to a refinery where it is distilled into its useable components. Distillation separates the crude into fractions based on their individual boiling ranges. The crude is heated until each fraction boils off as a vapor, and then is condensed and subjected to further processing. This boiling is essentially the same circumstance occurring during volatization in an engine, with lighter molecules vaporizing and heavier molecules remaining. In refining, this process can effectively increase the amount of similar molecular structures in each fraction, and therefore improve the stability and quality of each product refined. However, even the final petroleum-based product still consists of a wide range of hydrocarbon structures. These are sometimes referred to as a “chemical soup.”
This “chemical soup” found in standard petroleum mineral oils contributes to many of their shortcomings when compared with synthetic oils. Because these molecules prevent uniformity, the oil has a tendency to deteriorate more rapidly. If lighter fractions are present in the oil, they can boil off (or volatize) which leads to oil consumption, oil thickening and a loss of performance.
|A Fractioning Tower can separate the useable portions of crude oil to obtain common end products.|
Money to Burn?
Even though many motorists do not realize it, when they notice that their vehicle is “using” oil they are often witnessing the effects of volatization. Most simply buy extra oil to replace what they assume the motor has “used” and check regularly to see if the level is low. But is adding more mineral oil necessarily the best solution to the problem? What they may in fact be doing by adding more petroleum-based mineral oil is burning up their money.
For example, if an automobile needs five quarts of mineral oil sold at $2 a quart to operate during a 3,000- mile drain interval, and the mineral oil used in the vehicle volatizes and is replaced at a rate of one quart every 1,000 miles, the automobile actually goes through 7 quarts of mineral oil during the drain interval and the motorist spends an extra $4 per oil change interval on “topping off” the levels. Considering that the average vehicle puts on 15,000 miles a year, $20 in extra oil is used to keep the oil levels sufficient.
But extra oil is not the only expense motorists face when dealing with volatization. As motor oil goes through the process of volatizing, the chemically lighter (or more volatile) portions are always the first to “boil off” in the oil. This leaves the heavier, less pumpable portions behind. This heavier oil cannot be relied upon to flow easily and quickly to all of the engine components.
The end result is decreased fuel efficiency, premature component wear and deposit formation within the engine. The expense to the motorist can be quite substantial.
This is the NOACK Volatility Test apparatus. An oil sample is weighed before the test procedure is begun and after the test is completed. The amount lost by weight, due to volatility, is reported as a percentage.
The gray box houses the oil sample, which is heated to 150°C (302°F). Dry air is passed over the sample carrying off oil vapors with it. The beaker on the right receives the oil that has “boiled off.” It works somewhat like a petroleum fractioning tower or still. Acceptable percentages of loss by weight are determined by the grade and weight of the oil that is being tested.
The Synthetic Solution
Synthetic motor oils have a natural advantage over petroleum-based oils when it comes to volatility. This is because synthetic oils are designed to have uniform chemical structures. This eliminates the extra chemicals and hydrocarbon structures (or “chemical soup”) found in oils based only in mineral stock. Because they contain less lighter chemical portions to boil off, synthetic products lose less of their lubricating abilities to volatization.
AMSOIL Synthetic Motor Oils maintain their viscosity and provide ongoing cold start protection, fuel efficiency and reduced oil consumption.
An AMSOIL First
Surprisingly, volatility was not always considered when comparing motor oils. Few oil companies published test results measuring an oil’s volatility until the 1980s, when AMSOIL became the first in the United States to publish NOACK Volatility Test results.
In the NOACK Volatility Test the oil is heated to 150° C for a specified period. Lighter oil fractions will “boil off,” leading to oil consumption, oil thickening and a loss of performance. The percentage lost, by weight, due to this “boil-off” is reported.
The test has different passing requirements depending on the weight of the oil being tested. For example, 10W-30 oil in the United States may lose up to 22 percent, by weight, and still be “passable.” However, with 20 percent gone, the oil suffers significant performance deficits in characteristics such as pumpability and lubricity.
Effective July 1, 2001, a new specification, known as GF-3, allows a maximum of 15 percent loss. European standards, which have been stricter for years, already limit high quality oils to a maximum of 13 percent loss.
AMSOIL 10W-30 loses only 6.76 percent to volatility.
AMSOIL reports these results because they enable informed consumers to understand the value offered by synthetic motor oils. Low oil volatility means reduced oil consumption rates, maximum fuel efficiency and higher levels of performance for longer periods of time.
|These are the results of a typical NOACK Volatility Test. Improvements in the field of lubrication have led to increasingly lower weight loss percentages for all types of oil. However, synthetics have generally always outperformed mineral oil based lubricants. AMSOIL synthetics consistently boast lower loss by weight percentages than competitors’ oils.|